UK’S 3RD LARGEST FACILITIES ACCOMODATION PROVIDER BENCHMARKED ITS OPERATIONAL AND GROWTH PERFORMANCE AMONG ITS TOP 10 COMPETITORS PLAYERS IN ITS SECTOR SECURING CONTINUED BACKING FROM THEIR INVESTORS

Industry: Facilities Management, Construction, Student Accomodation, Universities, Higher Education

Services: Strategy Consulting,  Market Sizing, Competitive Assessment, CEO Advisory, Investor Analysis, Benchmarking

The Client

The client is UK’s major provider of on-campus residential and academic accommodation infrastructure. With over 35,000 rooms in operation or under construction, the client is heavily focused on the higher education sector in the UK. In addition to designing, building and financing, it also operates the on-campus residential and academic infrastructure.

The Challenge

The client wanted to understand how it compares against its competition in terms of financial strength and profitability. The client also wanted to get a sense of what kind of profitability improvement can its shareholders expect through the business plan.

The Solution

It was observed that the client did not have an obvious direct competitor. As such, for the purpose of this assessment, the Higher Education FM sector was considered, and two segments of providers were identified:

  • FM providers
  • Direct let accommodation providers

As a first step, the revenue and profitability of major FM providers such as Interserve, Engie Services and Sodexo were analyzed. The analysis of FM players revealed the following:

  • Barring exceptions, FM providers generally make margins between 2.5 – 7.2%
  • As a comparison, the client was usually bidding between 8 – 10% contract margins. However, after factoring in central overheads, the client’s margins are comparable to the best performing FM players
  • The possibilities of the client squeezing out more margins from its contracts seems very unlikely

A similar comparison with Direct let operators revealed the following:

  • Direct let operators usually make better margins when compared to traditional FM players
  • This is attributable to the fact that FM is only a part of the deal for Direct let operators, and they also take on extra risk due to the long-term deals

Post comparison with both the groups, it was inferred that the client was already making the most from its contract bidding and it was not likely that it will increase its bid margin. Any potential improvement in margins can only be effected through operational improvements and not through the bidding process.

The Results: The Client successfully secured £180m investment which cemented their place as Top 3 accomodation services provider in UK